For contemporary Christians, many of our questions and
doubts are shaped by how we view the Bible.
For instance, how we view the Bible frequently shapes Christian views on
the theory of evolution, which will be my sermon topic the following Sunday on
January 20th.
This Sunday, January 13th, I will explore the question of
how we should view the Bible, focusing on whether we must interpret the Bible
as literally true. Many Christians
accept the Bible as literally true.
These Christians “affirm that Scripture in its entirety is inerrant,
being free from all falsehood, fraud, or deceit.” They deny that science invalidates what the
Scripture teaches about the creation of the universe or the flood when Noah
built the Ark.[i] The advantage of this approach is that it
preserves the authority of scripture and recognizes that scripture is God’s
divine word. The difficulty with this
approach is that it seems to put scripture in direct conflict with much of
modern science, such as the theory of evolution. This perspective also asks Christians to
suspend their scientific perspective when interpreting certain stories and
passages in the Bible, such as Noah and the flood.
By contrast, other Christians do not interpret the Bible as
literally true, although they usually recognize the Bible as the divinely
inspired Word of God. This approach to
the Bible opens up additional options for interpreting the Bible, which do not
put the Christian in direct conflict with what we know from science about
evolution. Neither does it require Christians
to suspend their scientific perspective when interpreting stories, such as the
story of Noah and the flood. Yet, at the
same time, a difficulty with this approach is that it may raise questions about
the authority of scripture that the literalist approach powerfully rejects.
My sermon this Sunday, January 13th will explore this
crucial question concerning how we should approach the Bible. I will base the sermon on 2 Timothy 3:
14-17. The key verse here is verse
16: “All scripture is inspired by God
and is useful for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in
righteousness…”.
This sermon is the second in a series, called: “Confronting Our Doubts.” For a complete listing of the series, see my
first post below. Since these topics
raise doubts, there are always at least two viewpoints. In exploring these topics, I am not trying to
convince everyone to take one side over the other. Rather, through confronting issues that raise
doubts, we can gain deeper understanding and a stronger faith. At the same time, I think it is important that
as the pastor I share where I am on this issue.
So, in answer to the question, “Is the Bible Literally True?” my
response is “No.” Whether you agree or
disagree with me, I hope that this sermon will stimulate deeper reflection and
understanding, concerning this doubt.
Feel free to join and post your comments on this blog. If you live in the Meriden-area and do not have a regular church home, please consider attending Meriden UMC this Sunday. Meriden UMC is located at the corner of Dawson and Main. Our worship service starts on Sundays at 10 am. Everyone is welcome because God loves us all.
[i]
Article XII of “The Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy,” sponsored by the
International Council on biblical Inerrancy, 1978.
No comments:
Post a Comment