Saturday, September 6, 2014

"Building Stronger Relationships: True Friendship"

            This is the second installment in my sermon series on “Building Stronger Relationships.”  As noted last week, I want to focus on the following questions in this series:

Ø  What kinds of relationships does God intend for us to have and maintain?
Ø  What kind of relationship-partner does God call us to be?
Ø  How can we be faithful to God in the manner that we live out our relationships?

Whereas last weekend we began the series by exploring family relationships, this Sunday, September 7th, I want to concentrate on the relationship between friends.  In his book, Nicomachean Ethics, the Greek philosopher Aristotle explores the concept of friendship in great depth.  In his analysis, Aristotle identifies three different categories of friendship:

1.      Friendship based on utility.  These friendships arise because both persons get something out of the relationship.  For instance, two business owners may cultivate a friendship because they depend upon one another’s business in order to be successful in their own business.  Their friendship may include things such as occasional social activities together, remembering one another’s birthdays and anniversaries, and small gifts or cards at Christmas time.  Yet, the grounding for their friendship is utility—what they get out of the relationship.  For instance, if one business person decides to retire, then the friendship would dissolve.

2.      Friendship based on pleasure.  In these cases, friendships arise because the two persons derive joy and pleasure from one another’s company, based upon each other’s looks or wit or some other quality.  For example, we might say to ourselves, “I must invite X to my Halloween party because she always tells funny stories and we will all enjoy ourselves, if she comes.” 

3.      True Friendships.  For Aristotle, there was a decided superficial quality to the first two types of friendship, which led him to propose a third type of friendship that we might call, “true friends.”  True friendships contain the first two types of friendships.  In other words, true friends are mutually beneficial to one another and they bring each other joy and pleasure, as well.  Yet at the same time, there is a deeper, more enduring dimension to true friendships.  For Aristotle, true friends bring out the best qualities in one another and they help one another to be good persons and to develop a virtuous character.

Even though Aristotle lived at a different time and in a completely different social context, I have always appreciated his analysis of friendship.  True friends are more than flatterers.  They are honest and sometimes they tell us what we need to hear—even though it’s not what we want to hear.  True friends are also loyal.  That is, they remain faithful to our relationship, regardless of how badly things are going for us.  For Aristotle, there is a complementarity in true friendship, where each friend makes the other one a better person.

           One of the best examples of true friends is the story of David and Jonathan in the Bible.  Their story occurs in 1 Samuel.  Jonathan is from royalty; he is the son of King Saul, who was the first king of Israel.  By contrast, David comes from a much humbler family background.  Yet, David proves to be a great warrior.  We first meet David in 1 Samuel 17, when he saves the day for the Israelite Army by defeating the Philistine giant, Goliath, in hand-to-hand combat.  After the Israelites rout the Philistines, David joins the army.  Over time, he rises to the rank of General in the army.  During this same time, David and Jonathan develop a deep friendship, which would meet Aristotle’s criteria for a true friendship. 

           Jonathan’s father, King Saul, has a love-hate relationship with David.  On the one hand, Saul really appreciates David’s fighting ability and his leadership skills.  With David as their leader, the Israelite Army becomes very successful, winning battle after battle.  On the other hand, Saul feels threatened by David’s success.  During the victory celebration after one battle, for example, the women sing: 

“Saul has killed his thousands,
And David his ten thousands.” (1 Samuel 18: 7)

           Over time, I believe that Saul becomes mentally ill.  His mentally illness manifests itself in sudden outbursts of extreme violence.  By 1 Samuel 20, David has begun to fear for his life, and he shares his fears with his friend, Jonathan.  At first, Jonathan is skeptical of David’s concern, but eventually Jonathan begins to wonder.  The two friends decide to check out David’s concern with a sort of experiment.  David decides not to attend a major festival, which  he would normally be expected to attend.  If King Saul notices his absence and questions where David is, then Jonathan is to explain David’s absence as the result of a family commitment. 

           At the festival, King Saul does notice David’s absence and he asks where David is.  When King Saul hears Jonathan’s explanation of David’s absence, he becomes extremely angry.  At the same time, King Saul sees through his son, Jonathan, and perceives that Jonathan and David are colluding together.  This causes King Saul to also become angry with his own son.  He tells Jonathan, “For as long as the son of Jesse [David] lives upon the earth, neither you nor your kingdom shall be established.  Now send and bring him to me, for he shall surely die.” (2 Samuel 20:31)

           In his heart, Jonathan realizes there is some truth to his father’s words.  If he lives, David will ultimately become king instead of Jonathan.  Yet, Jonathan and David are true friends.  So, instead of betraying David, Jonathan actually helps him to flee from King Saul’s wrath—even though the act of saving his friend means that ultimately Jonathan will never become king himself. 

           As noted above, the story of Jonathan and David is a perfect example of true friendship as understood by Aristotle.  The two friends are fiercely loyal to one another; they are honest with one another; and they make each other better persons.  But, the relationship between Jonathan and David has one other quality, as well.  The two friends are willing to make sacrifices for one another—even to the point of being willing to sacrifice their lives or, in the case of Jonathan, a willingness to sacrifice the opportunity to be king.  Going beyond Aristotle, I would argue that sacrifice can be an important element of true friendship—provided that the willingness to sacrifice is mutual and for a higher good.

 

Come, join us this Sunday, September 7th, at Meriden United Methodist Church, as we explore further the qualities that help us to be true friends.  Our church is located at the corner of Main and Dawson Streets in Meriden, Kansas.  Our classic worship service starts at 10 am on Sunday mornings. 

Everyone is welcome and accepted because God loves us all.

No comments:

Post a Comment